Trust Panel
You shouldn't have to take
the AI's word for it
The Trust Panel shows you exactly where every answer came from, how confident it is, and whether the sources are still current. Verify everything. Trust nothing blindly.
Click any citation. See the source. Decide for yourself.
This is a working simulation of the Trust Panel. Click a numbered badge to see which source backs that claim. Hover a source card to see which part of the answer it supports.
Full-time employees are entitled to 16 weeks of paid parental leave . This applies to both primary and secondary caregivers . Part-time employees receive proportional leave based on contracted hours .
Trust Panel
Click the numbered badges to see how citations work
Six things the Trust Panel tells you that other AI tools don't
Claim-level citations
Not 'Source: Google Drive.' Each fact links to a specific passage in a specific document. Click it, read the original, make up your own mind.
...employees receive 16 weeks1
Confidence scoring
A number from 0 to 100 that tells you how well-supported the answer is. Based on source quantity, quality, and agreement — not on how confidently the AI writes.
Document freshness
Is this source still relevant? The Trust Panel classifies each document by type — a contract is evergreen, a Slack message is ephemeral — and tells you whether to trust it.
Conflict detection
When two sources say different things, the Trust Panel flags it. No silently picking one over the other. You see the disagreement and decide.
Missing references
If the answer references a document InternalWiki doesn't have access to, you'll know. No pretending gaps don't exist.
Suggested contacts
When confidence is low, the Trust Panel shows who wrote the source document or who the subject-matter expert is. The AI steps back and points you to a human.
What the confidence score actually means
It's not how sure the AI is. It's how much evidence exists.
Three current sources all say the same thing. The documents are recent, authorised, and in agreement. Safe to act on.
One strong source and one that's potentially outdated. The information is probably right, but verify before making a decision that matters.
Only one tangentially related source found. The AI is guessing more than citing. The Trust Panel suggests checking with Sarah Chen, who authored the most relevant document.
Why document age is the wrong way to measure freshness
A five-year-old contract is still valid. Yesterday's Slack about a meeting time is already stale. InternalWiki understands the difference.
Employment Contract.pdf
Created 5 years ago
Evergreen
Valid until explicitly replaced
InternalWiki classifies freshness by what the document IS, not when it was written. A five-year-old contract and yesterday's meeting notes are both current — for completely different reasons.
The difference one panel makes
What happens when answers come without evidence.
What's our parental leave policy?
Employees are entitled to 12 weeks of parental leave. This applies to all full-time staff members.
“12 weeks? That doesn't sound right...”
Where did you get that from?
Based on company policies and documentation.
Actually checked: The AI pulled from Employee Handbook 2021. The policy was updated to 16 weeks in January 2026.
Decision made on outdated information.
Full-time employees are entitled to 16 weeks of paid parental leave 1. This applies to both primary and secondary caregivers 2.
Source verified. Policy confirmed current.
Questions your team asks every day
Each one gets a cited answer with full traceability.
What is our parental leave policy?
Who approved the Q3 budget increase?
When does the Berkeley Square lease expire?
What’s our process for vendor onboarding?
How many days of annual leave do I have left?
What were the action items from the board meeting?
See what trust looks like
Ask your first question with full traceability.
No credit card required